An analysis of bicycle and wheelchair usage on buses as it pertains to bicycles inside buses based on July 2001 ridership info.
A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I
							b/wc-
route	total	wc	bikes	bike/wc	bike/tot	wc/tot	wc/10	rank
2	5456	19	229	12.05	4.20%	0.35%	10	1	*			EXPLANATIONS
3a	3477	26	80	3.08	2.30%	0.75%	0	2
3b	4634	9	158	17.56	3.41%	0.19%	17	1	*
3n	452	0	18	1000.00	3.98%	0.00%	1000	1	*		A - Route number
4	4957	69	55	0.80	1.11%	1.39%	(6)	3			B - Total Ridership
6	2921	14	40	2.86	1.37%	0.48%	1	2			C - Wheelchair ridership
7	3179	20	43	2.15	1.35%	0.63%	0	2			D - Bicycle ridership
7n	2300	10	122	12.20	5.30%	0.43%	11	1	*		E - ratio of bikes to wheelchairs
8	4711	25	49	1.96	1.04%	0.53%	(1)	3			F - ration of bikes to total ridership
9	147	0	8	1000.00	5.44%	0.00%	1000	1	*		G - ratio of wheelchairs to total ridership
12a	108	0	3	1000.00	2.78%	0.00%	1000	1	*		H - a general guess at a way to rank which
30	3973	34	178	5.24	4.48%	0.86%	2	2			routes would be best for bikes inside buses
31	1523	14	57	4.07	3.74%	0.92%	3	2			based on a high ratio of bikes to wheelchairs
33	561	3	35	11.67	6.24%	0.53%	11	1	*		and a low absolute number of wheelchair
34	201	6	15	2.50	7.46%	2.99%	2	2			users.
35	43382	70	1755	25.07	4.05%	0.16%	18	1	*		I - my personal ranking based on the
36	925	0	30	1000.00	3.24%	0.00%	1000	1	*		information I had available.
40	2333	4	157	39.25	6.73%	0.17%	39	1	*
41	1912	1	200	200.00	10.46%	0.05%	200	1	*		Any bikes inside bus program would of course
42	1245	3	92	30.67	7.39%	0.24%	30	1	*		require that bikes only board when wheelchair
51	427	9	8	0.89	1.87%	2.11%	(0)	3			spaces are unoccupied and the passenger load
52	1621	23	18	0.78	1.11%	1.42%	(2)	3			is light enough to accommodate a bicycle on
54	7434	76	184	2.42	2.48%	1.02%	(5)	3			board, and that a bicyclist would need to
59	299	1	2	2.00	0.67%	0.33%	2	2			deboard if these conditions changed. A program
60	381	1	3	3.00	0.79%	0.26%	3	2			for bikes on board could potentially require a
63	1913	149	46	0.31	2.40%	7.79%	(15)	4			training program or permit program that could be
65	11156	116	325	2.80	2.91%	1.04%	(9)	3			implemented by a 3rd party such as the Hub for
66	16939	153	471	3.08	2.78%	0.90%	(12)	4			Sustainable Transportation.
67	12202	88	346	3.93	2.84%	0.72%	(5)	3
69	19727	101	687	6.80	3.48%	0.51%	(3)	3
69a	6049	21	172	8.19	2.84%	0.35%	6	2
69n	3733	13	164	12.62	4.39%	0.35%	11	1	*
69w	28563	129	815	6.32	2.85%	0.45%	(7)	3
69L	3306	29	114	3.93	3.45%	0.88%	1	2
70	9	0	0	1000.00	0.00%	0.00%	1000	1	*
71	91478	501	2918	5.82	3.19%	0.55%	(44)	4
72	9851	22	145	6.59	1.47%	0.22%	4	2
73	8737	32	95	2.97	1.09%	0.37%	(0)	3
75	12386	22	145	6.59	1.17%	0.18%	4	2
78	300	2	5	2.50	1.67%	0.67%	2	2
79	3084	19	62	3.26	2.01%	0.62%	1	2
81	4939	47	115	2.45	2.33%	0.95%	(2)	3
91	9220	7	332	47.43	3.60%	0.08%	47	1	*